Fatwa
Concerning the Islamic Prohibition of Using Paper-Money
as a Medium of Exchange
GRANADA, 18th of August of
1991.
The proof of this prohibition of
usury comes from the book of Allah :
"Allah has permitted trade and
forbidden usury"
(Quran, 2, 275)
Allah has forbidden usury, and
therefore all the transactions which fall under this
category are all forbidden by Allah. Imam Malik
said:
"Whatever makes a sale halal
makes it halal and whatever makes a sale haram makes it
haram"
("Al-Muwatta", Book of Commercial Transactions,
49)
We are going to prove,
Inshaallah, that the use of paper-money makes the
transaction usurious and haram and consequently we will
declare that the use of paper-money is haram.
This Fatwa consist of 4
parts:
Before we enter into a proper
analysis of what paper-money is, we will examine the law
to undertand what Allah has made haram, namely usury, so
that we will be able to identify it.
1. The Nature of
Usury
Then we will examine the nature
of paper money
2. What is
paper-money?
Then we will arrive at a
decision on the matter
3. CONCLUSION OF THE
FATWA
And finally we will examine how
can we implement the fatwa
4. APPLICATION OF THE
FATWA
The Nature of Usury
Usury in Arabic means increment,
excess. The definition of usury by Qadi Abu Bakr Ibn
al-'Arabi in his "Ahkamul'Qur'an" is:
"Usury (Riba) is any unjustified
increment by its countervalue ('iwadun)"
Another form of expressing the
same is:
"Usury is any unjustified
increment between the value of the goods given and the
countervalue of the goods received"
Definitions: What is the thing
that is increased in such a usurious contract? What is
increased in the usurious contract is not merely the
quantity, like for example, the weight of one good
against the other.We will call this caracteristic of the
goods: value (qimah). Value includes the quantity and
quality of the goods, and also is a reflection of a free
market and it is the reflection of a just transaction.
Goods ('ard) is anything containing wealth in general
that can be sold or bought, including merchandises and
the particial use of rentable merchandises. The value of
goods is the comparative relation with some other goods
in a just commercial transaction (bay'). Value is each
one of the two relations between two equivalent
parts:
The value of A is B:
A=B
The value of B is A:
B=A
...
Note for people miseducated in a
Faculty of Economics:
The kafirs speak of value as a
subjective/objective representation. Value is sometimes
represented by a concept of subjective utility (Galiani),
sometimes by objective labor (Smith, Ricardo), sometimes
represented by abstract labor (Marx), sometimes by
numerical data (Samuelson). Value is not something
psychical, is not a concept. To evaluate is a human act,
and an act only exists in its performance. Evaluation
exists only in the instant when two parties exchange
goods within certain existential conditions that make the
exchange equivalent. And these conditions are the matter
of Islamic Jurisprudence.
...
We warn all Muslims against the
spread of the kafir doctrines of Karl Marx among
ourselves, sometimes through the influence of munafiqun
and ignorant people. Karl Marx was a Jew of a very
important rabbinical family in Germany. The core and
basis of his doctrine is called: the doctrine of
surplusvalue (Mehrwert, in the original German),
which for Marx was like robbery. Surplusvalue could
literally be translated in Arabic (a semitic language
like hebrew) as Riba. Usury comes from latin.
Surplusvalue is a literal translation of the semitic word
which means usury. If we realise that surplusvalue
'means' usury, we can see how Marx then twisted the
meaning. Where we say making profit in one transaction is
usury, he said it is not usury (surplusvalue) and is
acceptable (halal). And where we say making profit in
between two transaction is trade and is halal, he said is
usury (surplusvalue) and is unacceptable (haram). Marx
twisted the meaning of usury to its opposite.
...
What is
paper-money?
What we know today as paper
money is the result of an historical evolution. And it is
still evolving*. Paper money in history has passed
through different stages, in which paper-money has
adopted different natures therefore has been understood
in different ways.
PAPER MONEY THROUGH
HISTORY.
Paper money is a creation of the
Kufr of the West and it is not the creation of Islam. It
was then introduce in the Muslim land through the
colonial and intellectual pressure of the kafirs, and the
colaboration of some munafikun.
In the European Middle Ages
money consisted of gold and silver, although generally
altered by the kings. The use of paper money is already
recorded, though limitedly in its use, between merchants
and bankers in Italy in the XI century, and later on in
Naples, Sweden, Cologne, Vienna or Granada from the XV
century right up to the short attempts or experiments
with paper money that happened in France during the XVIII
century (John Law in 1720). This original use of
paper-money must be distinguished from the use of paper
money in the new country called United States, when a
significant and fundamental change happened in the use of
paper money: Paper money, the dollar, became the
generalised and lasting medium of exchange. A third
period must be distinguished after World War II when
paper-money gradually became what it is today: a
monopolised merchandise standing on its own, not
representing other particular merchandise.
...
WHEN A DEBT BECAME THE LEGAL
MEDIUM OF EXCHANGE
The establishment of the Bank of
England had originated a new situation in relation to
paper money. The bank created by Patterson had 72,000
pounds in gold and they lent 16.75 times more to the king
of England (William of Orange) to finance his war against
France. He lent the money at an annual interest of 8.25%
so that it received 100,000 pounds a year of interest.
Although he had only 72,000 pounds he received an
interest of 100,000 a year, therefore, about 140% a year.
When some people started to rumour that the Bank had not
enough gold for all the receipts, the state, who needed
them to finance the war, declared them legal money of the
kingdom. By law the receipts had the same value as the
gold that they represented. The debt became legal medium
of exchange. The example was repeated successfully in
other countries, until it reached its peak with the
constitutional establishment of legal paper-money in
U.S.A.
...
On the trading generally with
receipts (debt):
The trading generally with
debts, without being contained to particular cases, is
usury and haram
Zayd ibn Thabit, one of the
Companions of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him
and grant him peace, made haram the trading with
receipts. He said it is usury.
Yahya related to me from Malik
that he had heard that receipts were given to people in
the time of Marwan ibn al-Hakm for the produce of the
market at al-Jar. People bought and sold the receipts
among themselves before they took delivery of the goods.
Zayd ibn Thabit and one of the Companions of the
Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, went to Marwan ibn al-Hakam and said, "Marwan! Do
you make usury halal?" He said, I seek refuge with Allah!
What is that?" He said, "These receipts [sukuukun] which
people buy and sell before they take delivery of the
goods." Marwan therefore sent guards to follow them and
to take them from people's hands and return them to their
owners.
("Al-Muwatta", Book of
Commercial Transactions, 44)
Conclusion
Paper-money as a debt cannot be
used as a medium of exchange. A debt is restricted to a
private contract between two parts, and it should remain
like that.
The general use of a debt in the
exchanges is in most of the cases haram, and it is in
general disapproved. It is only limitedly allowed in a
private situation. Therefore the use of a debt as a
medium of exchange is haram.
CONCLUSION OF THE
FATWA
After examining the nature of
paper money in all possible forms: as a debt (a promise
to pay a merchandise or representing a merchandise) and
as a merchandise, we have seen its use makes the
transaction usurious.
Paper money cannot be accepted
as a medium of exchange even if it represents a
merchandise gold or silver, on a nominal and one to one
basis. Even if that were the case it could not be used
outside the closed circuit of depositor and receiver.
Only on a private scale it can be transferred but may not
circulate.
But if we consider that nowadays
paper-money has become nothing but a pure symbol with no
reality attached except the imposition of the law, then
it is clear that the use of paper money is usury
because:
- Its 'legal value' is an
imposition by the state on the people and
- Its production is a limited
monopoly by the same state that imposes it.
Without these two elements which
are usurious conditions the value of the paper-money
would be nothing.
Therefore we declare a Fatwa in
Granada, for all the Muslims, by which:
After examining all the aspects
of paper-money, in the Light of the Qur'an and the Sunna,
we declare that the use of paper-money in any form of
exchange is usury and is therefore haram. It is not
permitted for the Muslim to accept or to give paper-money
in a commercial transaction. It is an obligation on the
Muslims to abandon usury and to introduce new media of
exchange, or money, and the best way is to follow the
sunna of the Messenger of Allah, salallau alaihi wa
salaam, by using gold and silver, or any other
merchandise commonly accepted as a medium of
exchange.
APPLICATION OF THE
FATWA
"The use of paper-money in any
form of exchange is usury and is therefore haram". This
fatwa obliges all the Muslims to abandon the practice of
usury in the form of using paper money as the medium of
exchange. The understanding of this fatwa should not lead
to the conclusion that therefore I can not take a taxi
back home because I will have to pay the taxidriver with
paper-money. This way of thinking is mockery with the
intention of preventing you from doing anything serious
about it. What one should understand is that money is not
a personal matter, but it is common agreement among
people. What one should do is to create an arena of
people where you can agree to accept a different medium
of exchange. This is a decision for a group, not a matter
for a single individual.
We must understand that the
introduction of paper-money as a medium of exchange among
the Muslims has been a process of 200 years. We must
understand that we have modelled and fashioned our ways
of trading and our ways of living around the existence of
paper-money. All this must change in order to be able to
avoid the haram.
...
The "Islamic Bank" is a
completely usurious institution used as a means to lure
the Muslim who still reject the banks to enter in the
banking system. The "Islamic Bank" is a Trojan horse in
Dar al-Islam.
Note: a warning against the
Modernist Movement and the allowance of usury
The inspiration behind the
Modernist Movement is said to have been Jamal-ud-Din al
Afgani (1839-1897), its brain was Muhammad 'Abdou
(1845-1905) and the one who extended it was Rashid Reda
(1865-1935). It appeared as a rejection of the
colonialism, but their emotional rejection of the West
was accompanied by a deep and not discriminated
admiration of the West. This movement is responsible for
the introduction of a false teaching that said banking
and insurance transactions are not usury and are allowed
in our Muslim community.
Muhammad 'Abdou because of his
position - he was posted as Shaykh (Director) of the
renowned University of Al-Azhar by Lord Cromer, Brithish
Governor of Egypt - was the most damaging of all. His
first fatwa as Shaykh al-Azhar was: "interest in saving
funds is allowed". He wrote (5th of Dec. of
1903):
"The stipulated usury is not
permisible in any case; whereas the Post Office invest
monies taken from the people, which are not taken as
loans based on need, it would be possible to apply the
investment of such monies on the rules of a partnership
in commendan"
("Al-Manar", vol. VI, part 18,
pag. 717)
The door to the using of the
banks and their banking money was therefore opened. The
basis of the "Islamic Bank" had also been delineated by
which the interest can be considered as if it were part
of parnership in qirad.
Muhammad Rashid Reda was the
founder of the magazine "Al-Manar" distributed around all
the Muslim World. He participated in the same circle of
people as Lord Cromer and 'Abdou. He opposed the
traditional position of the Madhhabs to impose his own
opinions. He also bitterly opposed the traditional Sufis.
His opinions are clearly exposed in his
writing:
"There is nothing in our
religion which is incompatible with the current
civilisation, especially those aspects regarded as useful
by all civilised nations, except with regard to a few
questions of usury [riba] and I am ready to sanction
[from the point of view of the Shari'a] everything that
the experience of the Europeans before us shows to be
needed for the progress of the state in terms of the true
Islam. But I must not confine myself to a school of law,
only the Qur'an and the authentic Hadith" ("Al-Manar",
vol. XII, p.239)
"Except with regard to a few
questions of usury [riba]" What he meant by a "few
questions" is for example that he saw nothing wrong with
taking up a life insurance policy ("Al-Manar", vol.
XXVII, pag. 346, also vol.VII, pags. 384-8, and vol.
VIII, pag. 588). He also decries the jurists' misuse of
Qiyas to extend to the area of prohibition on taking
interest on capital and suggests that the taking of
interest on monies left in the bank or post office does
not come under the prohibited usury. ("Al-Manar", vol.
VII, pag. 28).
The teaching of this people or
other people who use their arguments in their judgement
have to be rejected. With it the restoration of the
traditional fiqh that clearly forbids usury in all its
forms.
...
Some 'practical people' pretend
that you cannot leave paper-money and the banks. But to
abandon usury is not impossible, it is the easiest thing
possible. Allah does not imposes on any soul a duty
beyond that which it can bear. Allah has commanded us to
two distinctive tasks:
1. The abandoning of
usury
2. Fighting against those who
practice usury
Abandoning usury is also the
creation of a halal way of trading among ourselves, which
does not involve any form of paper-money or other
usurious practice. And fighting against the usurers is to
destroy the means by which they practice usury using all
the methods at hand (harb). Both of them must go
together, we cannot promote the destruction of the
usurious system if at the same time we do not provide an
alternative. Equally we will not be able to succeed in
establishing an Islamic market if we do not dismantle the
fragile structure of the financial and usurious nexus.
This is the future fight of the Muslims.
The Creation of an Islamic
Market
The Path towards the Islamic
Market should be a progressive, systematic, and strategic
abandoning of the usurious system.
The first step is
education. Knowledge of the basic rules of the Islamic
Market: the basis of qirad, a commercial transaction,
what is riba... This is essential because this knowledge
is practically lost. Most of the Muslims have adopted the
ways of the kafir, and have complete ignorance of how
this could be done Islamically.
Second it is obligatory
take on the fard of chosing an Emir in every community of
Muslims to whom all of them give oath of alliance (the
bai'at). The Emir is the seal of the community, gathers
the people together and pursues justice in the
controversies of the community.
Third we should start
implementing strategically the Law, this could be carried
out in three stages
a] Minting of coins: gold,
silver, copper, or anything commonly accepted. This is
for us real money. The sunna of the Messenger of Allah
was to use gold and silver as the main medium of
exchange
b] Establishment of Muslim Fairs
or Markets. Putting the coins in circulation, among the
people who will agree to keep them in circulation (and
not keeping them). Thus condition of the Trade Fairs
among Muslims will be to deal with the real coins and not
with paper. The Market should proliferate in different
communities, until we are able to establish permanent
ones in every Muslim community under the authority of an
Emir.
..
The Destruction of the Usurious
System
To impose the supremacy of our
deen to Kufr is an obligation for the Muslims. Allah has
made Jihad fisabilillah, halal for the Muslims. To fight
fisabilillah, the first condition is that the banner of
Islam must be raised high, it cannot be done by secret
organizations. Kufr cannot be fought with the weapons of
kufr, the military struggle cannot succeed unless we stop
paying a usurious tribute to the kuffar.
The first struggle against kufr,
should be against their usurious (financial and monetary)
system. The usurious system of money and finance is the
weakest part of their system, because it is based on pure
fantasy. The enourmous debts of the countries and the
even bigger debt of the individual persons to the banks
DOES NOT EXIST on paper. It is pure computer data. It is
like a magic. As long as people believe that this system
has a reality, they will find themselves prisoner of its
demands and ways. The moment they realise that the wealth
is in themselves and that they do not need this usurious
system, the system will collapse. Collapse is the
inevitable destiny of the usurious system, because Allah
has declare his war against those who follow it. In the
meanwhile a group of totally commited Muslims will take
on their duty to use strength and wealth to spoil and to
destroy the usurious system.
...
The events of recent History
reveal that the fight against the kufr cannot yet take
place in the battlefield, they are prepared for this in
the most extraordinary way, that they can kill without
being present. This is the kind of battle they are
expecting. But our battle is global, and clearly oriented
to their weakest point.
It is necessary to form small
groups, with the authority of one Emir, to fulfill this
obligation of the Muslims. The first step of these groups
is that they must swear absolute allegiance among
themselves for the purpose of the ghazwat. They must then
study the best strategy to have success. And then commit
themselves to the action.
About the targets the Shaykh has
said:
"It should be remembered that in
the early phase of the Jihad, raiding should be on
targets of all who participate in the haram usurious
practice, and that the jews have enhanced their power,
that is, the worthless paper-money, by their own hoards
of wealth, through control of the diamond and the gold
markets, and that these centres of hoarded wealth are
among the necessary first targets to finance the larger
struggle"
("The Sign of the Sword", p.
63)
The Islamic future will
inevitably target computer systems, and erase debt
information of major banks all over the world. Enter into
their system and transfer money at random, or to a
particular accounts that we can use. Alter the
information in a way that they cannot reconstruct it. To
do that we are in an excellent position because all
Muslim are potential mujahidin. And nowadays the Muslims,
whether it is correct or incorrect, are everywhere inside
the whole of the usurious system. This Muslims and their
expertise are our weapons. Weapons are not tanks
nowadays. Weapons are technical knowledge and people with
access to information. We have all that we need within
our Muslim Umma.
The computer networks are being
infiltrated everyday. In many cases by young boys for the
purpose of playing. This weakness is growing and growing
as their greed grows. It means that a free spirit and
conviction is the most powerful of all guarantees of
success.
Our businessman have also a task
to do. They have their own networks of people who trust,
and have access to very valuable information. The only
thing they have to do is stop being naive about the bank
and the financial institution. They should not play the
role of victims with them. Do not admit their conditions
and rules, but play with them at your favour. They have
to change the mentality. They should prepare themselves
within their rules to take from the enemy. Create
companies in a vacuum and absorb debt that will never be
paid back, create different financial identities to avoid
the control and taxation of the state, use everything you
know to take from them and sabotage them.
These teams of truly Muslim
Mujahedeen, should appear everywhere. Not only one head,
but we should be many heads. As the Shaykh
says:
"It follows that one should
strike at the place not expected. By extension, in the
light of the current situation, one may strike at several
centres all at the same time, thus causing havoc in the
enemy and their response."
("The Sign of the Sword", p.
63)
The election of the targets has
to be ordered by their priority in relation to the total
struggle against Kufr. We should not fell into the
temptation of chosing those which seem easier, but rather
we should chose those which are more effective against
the usurious system. We should also remember that
although the booty in Jihad is halal for the Muslims,
this is not the purpose of the fight. The purpose is to
make Kufr surrender to the deen of Islam. Therefore the
first targets must be the bigger targets, even if they
take longer to get organized. So that they can be
delitated, and you introduce chaos in their usurious
system. We should use the surprise, to hit in their key
communications centers and to their key people. And once
the first targets are covered we should move to the
smaller ones.
We call you all Muslims with an
Amir to the struggle fisabilillah against the usurious
system! These are just simple examples of how things can
be done. Victory is certain if we fight fisabilillah.
Therefore fisabilillah must be our constant remembrance.
Victory belongs to Allah.
The Book of
Allah:
"Allah imposes not on any soul a
duty greater than it can bear. For it gets every good
that it earns, and it suffers every ill that it earns.
Our Lord! Punish us not if we forget or make a mistake.
Our Lord! Do not lay on us a burden as You laid on those
before us. Our Lord! Lay not on us a burden greater than
we have strength to bear. And pardon us! And grant us
protection! And have mercy on us! You are our Protection!
So grant us victory over the disbelieving
people"
(Quran, 2,
286)
* It is evolving from its paper
form towards an electronic form representing some
hipothetical unit of money, as the universal and unique
the medium of exchange.
|