Gold and silver restore social equilibrium

The Dinar and the Dirham can be the world currency of all free people.

The 'dollar' is no longer the powerful currency that it was. Recent slides in its value on international exchanges have dramatically demonstrated the inherent weakness of a currency 'supported' by high interest rates, necessary to cover soaring foreign debt and mind-boggling governmental overspending. The USA, once the world's leading creditor, has now become its leading debtor,exceeding Brazil, Mexico, Argentina and Venezuela combined.

Gold can now replace the dollar, as the world currency, offering an unparalleled protection in relation to any other currency. Why gold?

Because all national currencies - even the 'mighty' US dollar - are simply pieces of paper. Their value is as strong, or as weak, as the country which stands behind them. Which paper currency would you choose as a refuge from a shaky dollar?

By contrast, gold is a precious metal. Its value depends on no nation, on no economy. The value is intrinsic, and therefore trustworthy. Moreover,it is easy to store, easy to transport. And instantly recognised for the genuine treasure it is, virtually anywhere in the world. It always has been. And always will be.

The schism that divides the defenders of gold and silver and their adversaries is not only utilitarian but also philosophical. The defence of gold and silver is solidly based on some fundamental considerations of political philosophy that the defenders of artificial currency cannot ignore.

"Money is not an invention of the State," wrote Menger, "nor is it the product of a law-making act. For its existence the sanction of political authority is not even necessary."

Money is the product of the division of labour and of the economy of exchange that man has established. When the traders intended to exchange their goods and services for other more commercial goods the precious metals appeared as the best choice and became the currency for the majority of people. Gold and silver had value because they satisfied the needs of man. Contrary to what happened to other useful merchandise, they were easy to divide into fractions, could be transported at low cost and kept safe with relative ease. The small weight of the Dinars (4.2 g. of gold), complemented with Dirhams (3 g. of silver), facilitates small transactions to occur with gold and silver coins, thus making these coins available to the widest number of people. Gold, as the most sound and stable currency in the world, is also the ideal medium for savings, because history has proved that its value in relation to other basic commodities has remained uniquely stable throughout centuries. An equally important advantage of gold, is that gold is universal;identical in Britain as in China, therefore perfect for making international payments without having to rely on the unpredictable and costly exchange rates of all other paper currencies. Gold is money we can trust.

For around 2,500 years the universal currency was made up of small pieces of gold and silver called coins. They survived for two millennia despite the numerous attempts by many governments to manipulate them and replace them with their own medium of exchange. This perception of the very nature of currency and the characteristics of precious metals at the service of the economic exchange leads us to think that gold and silver will probably survive another two thousand years. One way or another, the gold standard will prevail for a long time after the present eruption of artificial national currencies has been forgotten, or only remembered in the museums of numismatics.

The choice of currency is a matter of crucial importance. Do we want a system where the government will issue and manage the currency by means of the political and economic process? Or do we prefer that the people's own decision makes the choice? If we entrust it to the government and financial institutions then we must be ready to live with an artificial currency, which is ideal to serve political purposes. It can be expanded and contracted at will,according to the policies and economic suitability of the moment. But above everything it can be inflated at will to complement the tax income.

On the other hand, if we allow people to make their own free choice, it may well happen that they choose as a medium of exchange a great variety of trading goods. In the past, through a selective process of several thousands of years they chose precious metals -gold and silver- as currency. They will probably choose the same if they are given the freedom to do so. Imam Malik, the great Imam of Madinah in the early period of Islam, stated: "Money is any merchandise commonly accepted as a medium of exchange". Thus through the testimony of the greatest Islamic Imam, the Imam Dar al-Hijrah,the position of Islamic Law clearly stands in defence of the freedom to choose among all merchandise rather than the imposition of an artificial currency.

Bimetallic currency is a natural currency as opposed to an artificial one. There is no need for an Islamic government to establish a bimetallic currency by means of a deliberate legal act. In fact, the bimetallic currency does not need rules or regulations, laws or official control. It only needs the individual freedom to possess and use gold and silver coins with an implicit elimination of all taxes imposed on their use. There is no doubt that the freedom to possess gold does not only mean the freedom to buy it and sell it for industrial purposes but also the freedom to use it as a medium of exchange.

Using bimetallic coins means having a healthy currency. It means that the value of the currency is independent of the government. It is true that it cannot provide us with the unattainable ideal of an absolutely stable currency, but it protects the monetary system from the influence of governments and financial institutions, because the existing stocks of gold are independent of the desires and manipulations of the political and financial system.

The bimetallic coins as international currency were in the past the product of an evolution that occurred naturally without the need for institutions or treaties between governments. Nobody had to take care to make them work as an international currency. When the main nations of the world adopted it as a currency, the world found that it had a world currency. It is true that the different currencies had different names and various weights. But that did not matter much, since all of them were made of gold or silver and they could be exchanged freely. After all, an ounce of gold is an ounce of gold whether minted in the form of sovereigns or eagles.

The bimetallic currency united the world because the payments between nations ceased to be a problem. It facilitated trade world wide and promoted, with it, a division of labour on a world scale. Nations specialised in the merchandise for which they enjoyed greater advantages in the international market. But above everything, the bimetallic currency stimulated the export of capital from the industrial countries to the undeveloped areas. Without the fear of loss through devaluation or restriction in transfers, European and Muslim capital earnestly sought profitable opportunities in all the continents. As a result, trade and industry improved the conditions of work and life world wide.

Gold cannot be inflated by printing more of it. It cannot be devalued by government decree, and unlike paper currency it is an asset which does not depend upon anybody's promise to pay. Portability and anonymity of gold are both important, but the most significant fact is that gold is an asset that is no-one else's liability. All forms of paper assets: bonds, shares,and even bank deposits, are promises to repay money borrowed. Their value is dependant upon the investor's belief that the promise will be fulfilled. As junk bonds and the Mexican peso have illustrated, a questionable promise soon loses value. Gold is not like this.
A PIECE OF GOLD IS INDEPENDENT OF THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM, and its worth is underwritten by 5,000 years of human experience.

It may be that the return to the bimetallic currency will be an arduous and prolonged task. Since it was lost through a gradual erosion of monetary freedom, perhaps we will have to re-conquer it slowly and painfully going upstream back to freedom. This is the reason why we do not seek a law of reform or a law of restoration, nor a conversion or a parity, we are satisfied just with freedom. This is a short and direct path. It may take us years to tread this path and that will depend upon the resistance from ignorance and public prejudice and the greed and love of power of financial institutions. The government may for that reason take some stages in the path, which will offer new challenges that invite the supreme effort to restore freedom. It may take a short time, however, as national interest-debt becomes manifestly unpayable, countries may decide that they cannot afford to stay in the system any longer. The system will not survive.

 

Go to Chapter 7

The Return of the Gold Dinar